An up to date timeline containing notable events related to the Lavine V AAP Case. Most recent events listed first.

See the State Case Documents for the emergence of this case and the Federal Case Documents for the continuation of the case.

03/07/2022

David J. Llewellyn, representing Lavine, admitted pro hac vice.

03/07/2022

Aaron Lindstrom, representing AAP, admitted pro hac vice.

02/20/2022

Lavine files letter responding to AAP’s mischaracterization of Pacira.

02/14/2022

Judge grants leave to respond to AAP’s mischaracterization of Pacira.

02/11/2022

Lavine files letter requesting leave to respond to AAP’s mischaracterization of Pacira.

02/07/2022

AAP files letter in support of motion citing Pacira.

1/19/2022

Marc S. Silver, representing AAP, admitted pro hac vice.

01/11/2022

AAP files reply brief.

01/04/2022

Lavine files response to motion to dismiss.

12/13/2021

AAP files Motion to dismiss.

11/29/2021

Lavine files amended complaint.

10/28/2021

Mutually agreed stipulation to file amended complaint by 11/29/2021 and amended motion to dismiss by 12/13/2021, response to motion to dismiss by 1/4/2022 and AAP response by 1/18/2022.

10/15/2021

Jonathan Lupkin, representing Lavine, admitted pro hac vice.

10/12/2021

AAP files amended motion to dismiss.

09/28/2021

Court grants leave to amend motion to dismiss.

09/20/2021

AAP files “letter” requesting leave to file amended motion to dismiss.

09/17/2021

Case removed to federal court by AAP.

09/02/2021

Lavine Files Opposition to Motion to Dismiss.

06/18/2021

AAP Files Motion to Dismiss.

03/04/2021

AAP served with official notice. Notice filed with the court.

02/05/2021

Complaint filed in New Jersey state court alleging intentional and constructive fraud against AAP (MER-L-000272-2) by Andrew DeLaney on behalf of Lavine.